Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, having a 79.8 score against 79. The Motorola One Hyper is a a little lighter phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, but both of them are 0.35inches thick. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS, so they should offer identical OS features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a bit superior processor than Motorola One Hyper. They have 8 processing cores and the same RAM amount. Motorola One Hyper counts with a display that's just as good as the screen in Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although the Motorola One Hyper has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display.
The Motorola One Hyper has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with improved battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 26 percent larger battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has just a bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with a much lower 48 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light photography and videos.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.