Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's overall score of 79. Even though Motorola razr (2020) and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S were released only a few months apart, Motorola razr (2020) is somewhat thinner and a little lighter. Both phones we compare here come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a bit better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a little bit higher screen pixel density and a quite larger display.
The Motorola razr (2020) and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S count with very similar cameras, and although the Motorola razr (2020) has a larger aperture, they both have a same size sensor, a camera in the back with a 48 MP resolution, the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition. The Motorola razr (2020) has a greater memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a much better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.