Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 15 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 393 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a score of 79.2, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's general score of 79. Both devices in this review include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has newer 15 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11, so it gives you some additional features. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) body is extremely newer, a little bit lighter and noticeably thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a way better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller screen. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a very superior processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 12 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a lot higher video definition and a higher 50 megapixels resolution back camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a bit better battery life than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.