Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Ocean |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 has a general score of 79.7, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's 79 global score. OPPO Find X2's design is thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, although both were released only a few months apart. These phones include Android operating system, but the OPPO Find X2 has older 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11 version.
The OPPO Find X2 has a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a larger amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X2 features a better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the OPPO Find X2 also has a higher display pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels.
The OPPO Find X2 has a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X2 takes clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a 48 mega-pixels back-facing camera, a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor and the same video definition, the OPPO Find X2 also has a larger camera aperture for better low light images and videos and better 60 fps video frame rate.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2, because it has a 20% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.