Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2 Neo, with a 79 score against 77.7. These devices come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a more recent 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10, so it offers a couple nice extra features and increased performance. Even being the best in this comparison review, we must tell that it is also somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a higher amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a just a little higher display density.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same (4K) video quality, the same camera sensor size and a same resolution back-facing camera, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a bigger camera aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features improved battery life than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.