Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Ocean |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a global score of 83.1, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's 79 general score. The OPPO Find X2 Pro is a just a little lighter device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, but they have the same thickness. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but OPPO Find X2 Pro has an older 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11 version.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with superior battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 4260mAh.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and the same video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a much bigger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos, higher video frame rate and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.