Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has an overall score of 79, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo's 76 global score. Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a better phone than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, it must be noted that it's also older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. These devices work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding operating system features.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has more RAM. The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a little bit better camera than OPPO Find X3 Neo, although it has a lower video quality and a less MP resolution camera, they both have the same aperture. OPPO Find X3 Neo has a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because it has a 12 percent more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is also a bargain compared to others, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.