Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-07 | -- |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has an overall score of 79, which is a bit better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's general score of 77. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S body is somewhat thicker and heavier than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both should provide the user very similar OS features.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a quite greater pixels density. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a really longer battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S takes slightly better photos and videos than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, a lot worse resolution camera in the back and a worse 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.