Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a global score of 79, which is a bit better than Galaxy A22's general score of 76.1. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has the previous 11 version and Galaxy A22 has Android 12. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is an older, just a little bit thicker and heavier cellphone than Galaxy A22.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A22. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A22, because it has more pixels per inch of display, a quite bigger display and a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy A22 counts with a bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A22 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A22, and although they both have a 48 megapixels resolution back camera and the same diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a lot higher (4K) video definition.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.