Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 5G has a global score of 84.6, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's score of 79. Both phones we are comparing here have the same Android 11 OS, so both should provide you all the same OS features. Galaxy A22 5G's construction has the same thickness than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, but it is a little lighter.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy A22 5G. Both have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy A22 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a just a bit greater display pixels density.
Galaxy A22 5G features a bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S have extremely similar batteries duration, although the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a 0% smaller battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S takes better videos and photos than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same resolution camera in the back, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.