Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, with a 79.9 score against 79. The Galaxy A25 5G construction is extremely newer, a little thinner and a bit lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both phones in this comparison come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A25 5G has a more recent 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little higher number of pixels per display inch. The Galaxy A25 5G has a very superior memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A25 5G counts with a battery lifetime that's very similar to Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's battery lifetime, although the Galaxy A25 5G has just 5000mAh battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a worse (4K) video resolution and a back facing camera with less mega-pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.