Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-04-07 | -- |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.37 ounces | -- |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A34 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, having an 82.9 score against 79. The Galaxy A34 is a much thinner and incredibly lighter phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A34 has the newer 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11 version.
Galaxy A34 features just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A34 has just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A34 also counts with a little better pixel density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A34, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much better camera than Galaxy A34. Both of them have the same resolution camera in the back, a same size aperture and the same sensor size.
The Galaxy A34's battery lifetime is just as good as the battery duration in Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, although the Galaxy A34 has a 0% smaller battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.