Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G has a score of 79.4, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's general score of 79. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A35 5G has a newer 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11, providing you a couple nice extra features and performance improvements. The Galaxy A35 5G is a just a little bit thinner phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, but they weight 7.37oz.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a really superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A35 5G has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, although it has a bit smaller screen, a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit lower pixels density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S both count with very similar battery durations, although the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a 0% smaller battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a tinier back camera sensor capturing lower quality photographs, a back camera with a worse resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, they both have the same camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.