Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-07 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, getting a score of 86.6 against 79. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11. Even though the Galaxy A50s and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S were released with only a couple of months difference, the Galaxy A50s is thinner and lighter.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A50s has a much greater memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has 64 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A50s also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S and Samsung Galaxy A50s feature extremely similar cameras, and although the Samsung Galaxy A50s has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photos or video in poorly lited situations, they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, a 48 MP resolution back camera, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 26 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.