Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, with a 91.3 score against 79. The Galaxy A52 5G is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a little lighter and just a little bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11, so it provides some nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a just a little greater pixels amount in each inch of display. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's processor is just as good as Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's processing unit, and although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Galaxy A52 5G takes clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, a F1.8 aperture and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a camera in the back with a much higher resolution and a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Galaxy A52 5G features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.