Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has a global score of 91.1, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's 79 general score. Galaxy A52s is a newer phone, and it's also just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both of these devices have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both should provide the same operating system features.
Galaxy A52s counts with just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a bit greater pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy A52s counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52s also has 2 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a little better battery duration than Galaxy A52s, because it has a 12% greater battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.