Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | -- |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F23 has a general score of 84.6, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's score of 79. The Samsung Galaxy F23 construction is newer, just a little thinner and extremely lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. These phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy F23 has a more recent 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11 version, so it gives a couple nice extra features and better performance.
The Samsung Galaxy F23 has a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2408 pixels. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy F23, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy F23. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount. Galaxy F23's battery life is very similar to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S one, although the Galaxy F23 has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much better camera than Galaxy F23, although it has a camera with a lower 48 megapixels resolution, they both have a same size aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.