Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-07 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note4, having a global score of 79 against 77.6. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's design is notably newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note4's, but it's a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note4 features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel number in each inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much better camera than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and videos in low-light situations, a lot bigger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos and a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a much greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a superior battery life than Galaxy Note4, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.