Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2020-04-07 | 2018-01-09 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a bit better than Galaxy On7 Prime, getting a 79 score against 76.9. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S design is way newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than Galaxy On7 Prime. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has the previous 11 version and Galaxy On7 Prime has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a quite worse display pixels density, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features just a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a bigger aperture, a lot better 3840x2160 video definition, a much more mega pixels back camera and a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much better battery duration than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.