Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-07 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's 79 overall score. Even though the Galaxy S10e is older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, it's body is noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner. Galaxy S10e counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a quite greater screen pixels density.
Galaxy S10e features a much better memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy S10e also has 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S10e counts with a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S10e also has more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has slower video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a much larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much more mega-pixels camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a much better battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S10e costs a lot more than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.