Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-07 | -- |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, with a 79 score against 76. Both devices in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has Android 14. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a a little bit lighter but thicker cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE.
The Galaxy S24 FE has a better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, although it has a little worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little bit worse number of pixels per inch of screen, they both have a display of the same size. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a very superior performance than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has 4 GB less RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S24 FE, because it has a 5020mAh battery size against 4700mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a lot better camera than Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a worse resolution camera, they both have a same size aperture.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.