Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-07 | -- |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.37 ounces | -- |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's score of 79. These phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a much lighter and extremely thinner phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has an incredibly better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a little bit bigger display, more pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a better storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a battery performance that is very similar to the battery duration in Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, although the Galaxy S25 Ultra has just 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in low-light environments, a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back camera with lot more MP and a much better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.