Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Blue and Red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a score of 79, which is a little bit better than Galaxy S5 Sport's overall score of 77.8. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has 11 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a extremely heavier device than Galaxy S5 Sport, but both have the same thickness.
Galaxy S5 Sport features a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080px resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has 4 less cpu cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a much better resolution back-facing camera, a lot larger sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a very superior memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.