Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-04-07 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's 79 score. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11, providing you some extra features. Even being the best device in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro body is heavier and much thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 cores. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels quantity in each display inch and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels, a much larger sensor and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features as much memory for games and applications as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S one, they have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.