Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a score of 85.6, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's overall score of 79. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 construction is newer, lighter and notably thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a little greater screen density and a bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a much more mega pixels back-facing camera. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.