Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, having a global score of 92.3 against 79. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is lighter and thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, even though they were released with only a couple months difference. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a bit better screen density and a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a way more megapixels camera and a much bigger back camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.