Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a little bit better than Xperia Z4v, getting a 79 score against 78.8. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S construction is noticeably newer than the Xperia Z4v's, although it's a little thicker and much heavier. Both devices we are comparing here include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a more recent 11 version and Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1, providing you a couple nice extra features.
The Sony Xperia Z4v has an incredibly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. Xperia Z4v counts with a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 processing cores, the Xperia Z4v also counts with an extra graphics processor.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a much better camera than Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture for better photography in low-light environments and a camera with a way better resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a superior battery life than Xperia Z4v, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S and the Xperia Z4v cost the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.