Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-07 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Black, Blue and Green |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's global score of 79. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's body is just a little bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, but it's a little bit heavier and was released only 17 months before. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a quite higher pixels count in each display inch.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a greater memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality and a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.