Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a general score of 84.3, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's global score of 79. These devices include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has newer 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11 version. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is a notably newer and extremely thinner phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, although it's also a little heavier.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a lot better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a lot higher 2224 x 2488 resolution, a larger screen and a little higher pixel amount in each display inch. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a very superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a bit superior battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity against 5020mAh.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 takes a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures, a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a back facing camera with a higher resolution and a much bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.