Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, getting an 87.9 score against 79. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the older 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro design has the same thickness than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, but it's just a little heavier.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has just a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both of them have a screen with the same size, the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution and the same amount of pixels in each inch of display. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 4700mAh.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting images or videos in low light environments, it also counts with a lot higher video definition, a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and photographs and a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.