Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, having a score of 81.6 against 79. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has the older 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11. Although Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a better phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, we must tell that it is also a a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker phone.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both have a higher number of pixels per inch of display, a same size screen and exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a way better resolution camera and a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and pictures.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.