Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | ZTE |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-07 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, having a score of 80.2 against 79. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro is an older device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, but it's lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Both devices we are comparing come with Android operating system, but the ZTE Axon 10 Pro has the older 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11 version.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S captures a little bit better pictures and videos than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs in poorly lited environments, they both have a 48 megapixels back camera and the same video quality.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a very superior memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has longer battery lifetime than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 26 percent greater battery capacity.
Although ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.