Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | ZTE |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-07 | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Black, Ochre and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a bit better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, getting a global score of 79 against 76.6. Although it's the best phone we compare here, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S body is thicker and somewhat heavier than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has the previous 11 version and ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little bit greater display density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S takes much better pictures and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs or video in low-light situations, and they both have a 48 mega-pixels back camera and a 0.5 inches camera sensor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a way better video quality.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with improved battery duration than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.