Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | ZTE |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2020-03-30 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is slightly better than ZTE Axon 11, getting a score of 79 against 76. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing, it must be told that it's also a somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone. These devices have Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has the newer 11 version and ZTE Axon 11 has Android 10 version, so it offers a couple additional features.
The ZTE Axon 11 has a little bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density. The ZTE Axon 11 features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has more internal storage and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 2 TB.
ZTE Axon 11 features a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have 8 cores, the ZTE Axon 11 also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a better camera than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a much less mega-pixels camera in the back and a worse (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features improved battery performance than ZTE Axon 11, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.