Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-18 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's 83 overall score. The LG Velvet construction is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, even when both of them were only released with a couple months difference. LG Velvet features a screen that is very similar to the display in Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although the LG Velvet has a bit inferior pixels quantity in each inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a bit larger display.
LG Velvet's processor is very similar to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T one, and although the LG Velvet has 2 GB more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a slightly better camera than LG Velvet. Both have a 0.5 inches sensor, a same size aperture, a same resolution back camera, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The LG Velvet has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has greater battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has a 16 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.