Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a global score of 83.4, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's 83 score. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has newer 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a a little thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, but they weight 7.02oz.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite larger display. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4600mAh.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a much larger sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality, a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.