Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's general score of 83. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10 version. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a much newer device, and it's also a little thinner and just a bit lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a higher resolution camera, a way larger sensor, better video frame rates and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.