Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-18 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's overall score of 83. Galaxy A52's body is just a little thinner and a bit lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, although both of them were released with only a couple months difference. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A52 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T both feature extremely similar displays, and although the Galaxy A52 has a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit more pixels per screen inch, they both have a display with the same size. The Galaxy A52 features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 also has a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A52, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.