Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, having a score of 91.3 against 83. Galaxy A52 5G's design is just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, although both were released with only 2 months difference. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10 version, providing you some nice extra features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T and Samsung Galaxy A52 5G both count with really similar displays, and although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a just a bit more pixels per screen inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, they both have a same size screen.
Galaxy A52 5G has a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Galaxy A52 5G shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a bigger sensor capturing higher quality pictures and a camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.