Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, with a 91.1 score against 83. The Samsung Galaxy A52s design is just a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, although they were only released 8 months apart. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A52s has newer 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10.
Galaxy A52s's processor is very similar to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T one, and although the Galaxy A52s has a higher amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A52s features a screen that is very similar to the display in Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although the Galaxy A52s has a just a little higher amount of pixels in each inch in the screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution, they both have a screen with the same size.
Galaxy A52s has just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52s also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
The Galaxy A52s has a superior storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.