Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, with a global score of 88.1 against 83. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy F62 has a newer 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10 version, so it gives you some additional features. Although it's the best phone in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy F62 construction is just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T.
Galaxy F62 features a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a just a little lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit bigger display. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a superior storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has more internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with more cpu cores. Galaxy F62 has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size aperture, the Galaxy F62 also has a larger sensor taking higher quality photos and a lot better resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much longer battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.