Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-18 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's 83 overall score. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10, so it provides you some nice extra features. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Fold is older and much heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, it's body is still thinner.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy Fold features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has just a bit better battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14% greater battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also counts with a much more megapixels back camera and a way larger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.