Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's score of 83. Both phones we compare here use Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10 version. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is a bit heavier but thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and both were released with only 5 months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has a just a little higher count of pixels per inch in the screen, a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a little bigger screen.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way higher video resolution, a camera with a way better 108 mega-pixels resolution and a much larger back camera sensor shooting much better quality pictures and videos.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.