Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-18 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, having a score of 83 against 80.4. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's body is extremely newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than Galaxy Note Fan Edition. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy Note Fan Edition. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a bit more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also counts with a larger back camera sensor and a much more mega pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.