Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-18 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, with an 88.3 score against 83. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S10 has 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10 version. Even though Galaxy S10 is older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, it's body is a lot lighter and somewhat thinner.
The Galaxy S10 has just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 3040 resolution. Galaxy S10 features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Galaxy S10 also has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also counts with a much more megapixels camera in the back and a lot bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.