Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-18 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's score of 83. Samsung Galaxy S10e's body is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, even though it was released just 23 months before. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a bit higher quantity of pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy S10e has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Galaxy S10e also has more internal memory capacity. Galaxy S10e has a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10e also has more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T captures better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and video and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also counts with a back facing camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution and a much larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.