Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's 83 overall score. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a just a little lighter and just a little thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, even when they were only released 4 months apart. These phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has newer 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10.
Galaxy S20 FE has just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 FE features just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit higher amount of pixels in each inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a much better storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has an 11% more battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T captures clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller back camera sensor shooting worse quality photographs and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also counts with a lot more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.