Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, having a overall score of 98 against 83. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10 version, so it gives a couple nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older and somewhat heavier device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, but Samsung was able to build it a little bit thinner anyway.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has a little bit larger display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a higher pixel density. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a battery lifetime that is very similar to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.