Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, with a general score of 95.4 against 83. Both devices we are comparing have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10 version. Even though Galaxy S22 Ultra is heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, it's a little thinner and also newer.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features an incredibly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has a better pixel density, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a quite bigger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T and the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra feature extremely similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has 4 GB more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a greater storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery performance is just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.