Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-18 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Daybreak purple and Nightfall black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a global score of 83, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active's overall score of 75.8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is a incredibly newer and a bit thinner device than Galaxy S7 Active, but it's also just a little heavier. Galaxy S7 Active counts with a better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has a greater number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking photos and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also counts with a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with longer battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.